gc_maine2
08-08 04:27 PM
OK good another thread, now you have posted this info you can also close this thread.:)
http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FAQ3.pdf
Q33: When filing an EB I-485 using the old fee, what version of the I-485 form do we use?
A33: The current I-485 form version dated “7/30/07 Y” should be used. The form can be found at www.uscis.gov
Q34: To ensure that the correct fee is submitted, may an applicant submit both a check for the old fee and a second check for the new fee?
A34: USCIS requires that all applications and petitions be submitted with the required filing fee or a waiver, if applicable. USCIS urges the public to exercise caution in submitting additional checks in incorrect amounts: extraneous checks may slow down the intake process and may result in an erroneous rejection of an application (as in the case where the check in the correct amount is missed) or in the inadvertent cashing of such checks, since filing fees are normally non-refundable. For additional information, the public is referred to the fee requirements announced in the Federal Register on August 1, 2007 (Temporary Adjustment of the Immigration and Naturalization Benefit Application and Petition Fee Schedule for Certain Adjustment of Status, FR at 41888). This regulation amends the new Fee Rule, and requires that aliens who file an employment-based Form I–485 and any related Forms I–765 and I–131, pursuant to Visa Bulletin No. 107, through August 17, 2007, must include the filing fees in effect prior to July 30, 2007. The new fee schedule becomes effective on July 30, 2007, for all other immigration and naturalization applications and petitions and on August 18, 2007, for Forms I–485 and all subsequent or ‘‘renewal’’ applications for advance parole and employment authorization based on pending Forms I–485 filed pursuant to Visa Bulletin No. 107.
Q35: Will previous USCIS policy still apply in those instances where the original approved labor certification cannot be included in support of an I-140 petition, such as when the original has been lost or previously filed with USCIS, or when a duplicate approval must be requested?
A35: Yes. While an original labor certification must be submitted in support of certain I-140 petitions, USCIS will continue to accept duplicates of previously filed Labor certificates and, as in the instances stated above, in cases where an original labor certificate has been properly filed with USCIS.
1 USCIS may issue future “FAQs” on this topic for the benefit of the public, should additional questions arise. Such FAQs will be dated and numbered for ease of reference. Department of Homeland Security
Q36: Will USCIS accept Schedule A concurrently filed I-140 petitions and adjustment of status applications that are filed on or after August 1, 2007?
A36: As previously stated, USCIS will accept properly filed Forms I-140 filed on behalf of aliens with a priority date on or after August 1, 2007; however, pursuant to August Visa Bulletin No. 108, USCIS will reject any concurrently filed adjustment of status applications filed by aliens with a priority date on or after August 1, 2007.
Q37: Will the new I-765 filing instructions apply to Forms I-765 filed based on employment-based adjustment of status applications filed pursuant to the July Visa Bulletin No. 107, if filed between July 30, 2007 – August 17, 2007?
A37: No. The fee of $180 for Forms I-765 and the fee of $170 for Form I-131 will remain in effect for those aliens eligible to file an employment-based adjustment of status application pursuant to July Visa Bulletin No. 107 until August 17, 2007.
Q38: Where should an employment-based adjustment of status application be filed if the underlying I-140 petition remains pending with USCIS?
A38: Forms I-485 may be filed at either the Nebraska Service Center or the Texas Service Center in accordance with the Direct Filing Update issued June 21, 2007, regardless of where the pending I-140 was filed. Applicants should submit a copy of the I-140 receipt notice or, if the applicant does not have a receipt notice, include a brightly colored sheet of paper on top of the filing with the following notice and information:
TO THE MAILROOM: The enclosed I-485 Adjustment Application(s) should be matched with a pending I-140 Immigrant Petition for which no Receipt Notice has been received. The Immigrant Petition [type, e.g., I-140] was delivered to [Service Center] on [provide date of filing and tracking number]; Petitioner's name; Beneficiary's name; Beneficiary's date of birth; Beneficiary's country of birth.
http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FAQ3.pdf
Q33: When filing an EB I-485 using the old fee, what version of the I-485 form do we use?
A33: The current I-485 form version dated “7/30/07 Y” should be used. The form can be found at www.uscis.gov
Q34: To ensure that the correct fee is submitted, may an applicant submit both a check for the old fee and a second check for the new fee?
A34: USCIS requires that all applications and petitions be submitted with the required filing fee or a waiver, if applicable. USCIS urges the public to exercise caution in submitting additional checks in incorrect amounts: extraneous checks may slow down the intake process and may result in an erroneous rejection of an application (as in the case where the check in the correct amount is missed) or in the inadvertent cashing of such checks, since filing fees are normally non-refundable. For additional information, the public is referred to the fee requirements announced in the Federal Register on August 1, 2007 (Temporary Adjustment of the Immigration and Naturalization Benefit Application and Petition Fee Schedule for Certain Adjustment of Status, FR at 41888). This regulation amends the new Fee Rule, and requires that aliens who file an employment-based Form I–485 and any related Forms I–765 and I–131, pursuant to Visa Bulletin No. 107, through August 17, 2007, must include the filing fees in effect prior to July 30, 2007. The new fee schedule becomes effective on July 30, 2007, for all other immigration and naturalization applications and petitions and on August 18, 2007, for Forms I–485 and all subsequent or ‘‘renewal’’ applications for advance parole and employment authorization based on pending Forms I–485 filed pursuant to Visa Bulletin No. 107.
Q35: Will previous USCIS policy still apply in those instances where the original approved labor certification cannot be included in support of an I-140 petition, such as when the original has been lost or previously filed with USCIS, or when a duplicate approval must be requested?
A35: Yes. While an original labor certification must be submitted in support of certain I-140 petitions, USCIS will continue to accept duplicates of previously filed Labor certificates and, as in the instances stated above, in cases where an original labor certificate has been properly filed with USCIS.
1 USCIS may issue future “FAQs” on this topic for the benefit of the public, should additional questions arise. Such FAQs will be dated and numbered for ease of reference. Department of Homeland Security
Q36: Will USCIS accept Schedule A concurrently filed I-140 petitions and adjustment of status applications that are filed on or after August 1, 2007?
A36: As previously stated, USCIS will accept properly filed Forms I-140 filed on behalf of aliens with a priority date on or after August 1, 2007; however, pursuant to August Visa Bulletin No. 108, USCIS will reject any concurrently filed adjustment of status applications filed by aliens with a priority date on or after August 1, 2007.
Q37: Will the new I-765 filing instructions apply to Forms I-765 filed based on employment-based adjustment of status applications filed pursuant to the July Visa Bulletin No. 107, if filed between July 30, 2007 – August 17, 2007?
A37: No. The fee of $180 for Forms I-765 and the fee of $170 for Form I-131 will remain in effect for those aliens eligible to file an employment-based adjustment of status application pursuant to July Visa Bulletin No. 107 until August 17, 2007.
Q38: Where should an employment-based adjustment of status application be filed if the underlying I-140 petition remains pending with USCIS?
A38: Forms I-485 may be filed at either the Nebraska Service Center or the Texas Service Center in accordance with the Direct Filing Update issued June 21, 2007, regardless of where the pending I-140 was filed. Applicants should submit a copy of the I-140 receipt notice or, if the applicant does not have a receipt notice, include a brightly colored sheet of paper on top of the filing with the following notice and information:
TO THE MAILROOM: The enclosed I-485 Adjustment Application(s) should be matched with a pending I-140 Immigrant Petition for which no Receipt Notice has been received. The Immigrant Petition [type, e.g., I-140] was delivered to [Service Center] on [provide date of filing and tracking number]; Petitioner's name; Beneficiary's name; Beneficiary's date of birth; Beneficiary's country of birth.
wallpaper Hey, #39;Jersey Shore#39; Cast!
shreekhand
07-04 10:47 PM
Look at the May VB, it was current, obviously;)
"__________________
EB3 Worldwide
PD 07/11/03
I-140 RD 02/27/06 AD 03/22/06
I-485 RD 05/07/07 filed at TSC
FP 06/02/07 (Code 3) - sent to USCIS same day
LUD 06/05/07
"
For RD to be 05/07/07, you must be eligible to file in the month of May and hence PD should be current as per April VB.
EB3 ROW was still Aug 2002 in April visa bulletin. How could you file for I-485?
"__________________
EB3 Worldwide
PD 07/11/03
I-140 RD 02/27/06 AD 03/22/06
I-485 RD 05/07/07 filed at TSC
FP 06/02/07 (Code 3) - sent to USCIS same day
LUD 06/05/07
"
For RD to be 05/07/07, you must be eligible to file in the month of May and hence PD should be current as per April VB.
EB3 ROW was still Aug 2002 in April visa bulletin. How could you file for I-485?
zoooom
06-17 07:59 PM
How about this scenario..
I invoked AC21 and changed job using my EAD. Now my new employer applied for my EAD and AP renewal. I got the approval for the renewal today....does that mean USCIS is ok with my application (AC21) or they will verify it at the time of 485 adjudication?
I invoked AC21 and changed job using my EAD. Now my new employer applied for my EAD and AP renewal. I got the approval for the renewal today....does that mean USCIS is ok with my application (AC21) or they will verify it at the time of 485 adjudication?
2011 jersey shore casting call 1
MeraNaamJoker
09-17 10:32 AM
Thank you for your responses.
My situation is different, since my 485 is not yet approved (PD Dec 2006 EB2).
Company A applied for my GC (140 approved and 485 filed in July 2007), but I have never worked for company-A. I had been working for company-B during all these on H1. However I am now with company-C for last 6 months using EAD.
I have never done the AC-21, since my lawyer said that is not required since I was with company-B and did not change jobs in between.
In my case, company-A is not closing down, and I am willing to work for them after 6 months or so.
My question is are there any risks in my 485 in this context?
Should I be moving to company-A to reduce any risk?
Would appreciate your responses in this.
Again the issue here will revert to the topic of SHAM EMPLOYMENT.
Either you should be working for the sponsor company or file AC21 and port out the process. That helps you to be on the safer side.
Even after filing AC21 two and half years back, my original approval notices went to my original GC sponsoring company's attorney's office.
My situation is different, since my 485 is not yet approved (PD Dec 2006 EB2).
Company A applied for my GC (140 approved and 485 filed in July 2007), but I have never worked for company-A. I had been working for company-B during all these on H1. However I am now with company-C for last 6 months using EAD.
I have never done the AC-21, since my lawyer said that is not required since I was with company-B and did not change jobs in between.
In my case, company-A is not closing down, and I am willing to work for them after 6 months or so.
My question is are there any risks in my 485 in this context?
Should I be moving to company-A to reduce any risk?
Would appreciate your responses in this.
Again the issue here will revert to the topic of SHAM EMPLOYMENT.
Either you should be working for the sponsor company or file AC21 and port out the process. That helps you to be on the safer side.
Even after filing AC21 two and half years back, my original approval notices went to my original GC sponsoring company's attorney's office.
more...
sujith1
07-30 12:41 PM
Same situation happened to me - My status shows as card production ordered while hers have no update.
The sad part is that I m continuing on H1 while she is working on her EAD and needs it approved soon
The sad part is that I m continuing on H1 while she is working on her EAD and needs it approved soon
nacho
07-15 06:23 AM
USCIS is not required to return your adjustment of status applications within any timeframe. If your number becomes current before you receive your applications back, i suggest that you send in new applications and indicate on the I-485 that you submitted adjustment of status applications in July 2007 and have not yet received any correspondence from USCIS on the case.
Can a core team member comment on this please?
Can a core team member comment on this please?
more...
gsc999
07-17 04:17 PM
Let us start sending Thank you flowers to IV core memebers such as Logic life, pappu ( i know only these two people) Please add to the list if you know anybody belong to Core team.
--
We recently used flowers as a sign of protest. My suggestion is not to send flowers to either IV core or congresswoman Zoe Lofgren or anyone else. That might send a mixed message although the intentions are good.
Instead of flowers, I recommend a funding drive. That would help the core IV to have more resources at their disposal to push for the next step, which is long term solution for visa retrogression.
--
We recently used flowers as a sign of protest. My suggestion is not to send flowers to either IV core or congresswoman Zoe Lofgren or anyone else. That might send a mixed message although the intentions are good.
Instead of flowers, I recommend a funding drive. That would help the core IV to have more resources at their disposal to push for the next step, which is long term solution for visa retrogression.
2010 #39;Jersey Shore#39; Cast Sunbathes
bluekayal
04-01 01:57 AM
Mitra Kalita is part of SAJA- South Asian Journalists Association.
more...
newbee7
07-05 11:56 AM
Ombudsman had correctly predicted this fiasco back in June before the dates were made current:
There will be severe consequences from rapid fluctuations in priority dates. If the priority date became current today, due to delayed USCIS processing and thus underutilization of visa numbers, some have predicted that within a few months as many as 500,000 to 750,000 individuals now residing in the United States under a temporary worker visa could apply for a green card. Additionally, DOL’s recent backlog elimination efforts, scheduled to be completed by September 30, 2007, are predicted to add 70,000 or more approved labor certifications yielding as many as 170,000 additional green card applications. As USCIS begins to complete these applications and request visa numbers from DOS, the 140,000 statutorily authorized visa numbers will be used. DOS then will be required to retrogress priority dates. Consequently, most applicants in this scenario will find themselves trapped where as they anticipated timely receipt of a green card, their wait exceeds seven or more years. In addition, all future employment-based green card applicants effectively would be barred from applying for many years.38
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/CISOMB_Annual%20Report_2007.pdf
Yes, if USCIS makes the dates current again it will be a great help.
But unless we try to get the visa numbers increased we might still have to wait for SEVEN or more years in "same or similar" job.
There will be severe consequences from rapid fluctuations in priority dates. If the priority date became current today, due to delayed USCIS processing and thus underutilization of visa numbers, some have predicted that within a few months as many as 500,000 to 750,000 individuals now residing in the United States under a temporary worker visa could apply for a green card. Additionally, DOL’s recent backlog elimination efforts, scheduled to be completed by September 30, 2007, are predicted to add 70,000 or more approved labor certifications yielding as many as 170,000 additional green card applications. As USCIS begins to complete these applications and request visa numbers from DOS, the 140,000 statutorily authorized visa numbers will be used. DOS then will be required to retrogress priority dates. Consequently, most applicants in this scenario will find themselves trapped where as they anticipated timely receipt of a green card, their wait exceeds seven or more years. In addition, all future employment-based green card applicants effectively would be barred from applying for many years.38
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/CISOMB_Annual%20Report_2007.pdf
Yes, if USCIS makes the dates current again it will be a great help.
But unless we try to get the visa numbers increased we might still have to wait for SEVEN or more years in "same or similar" job.
hair Nicole+Polizzi in Jersey Shore
Ingerried
04-14 04:12 PM
�������, ��������, ���������� �������� ����� ������. ����� ����� �������
�� ����� ��������, ������� ���������� ���������� ����� �������� �� �����
����� "����� �� ����� ����� ����������".
XVI �������� ���������� ��� �������, �� ������� ���� ���������� ��������
�������� �� �� ����� ��� ������� �����������. ����� ����, ������� ���
����������� ������������ �� ������ (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=320108)
��� ����� ����������� � ���������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=29921)
����������� ����� ���������� � ������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=250001)
����������� �� � ����������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/ctg.php?category=15&page=3)
����� ����� ������ ����� ����������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=654888)
�������� ��������� ���� ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=468460)
����� ����������� � �������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=585977)
������ ����������� ����� online (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=824957)
���� ���������� ������ ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/ctg.php?category=2&page=2)
����������� � ����� ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=557287)
����������� ������������ ����� ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=40265)
����������� ����� � ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=782255)
����������� ������ ��������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=44505)
������� ����� ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=845985)
����������� ������ ���� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=717388)
���������� ������� ����������� � ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=785423)
����� ����������� � ���������� (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=419816)
������ ����������� � ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=495782)
����������� � 12 ������ ����� (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=987036)
�������� ������� �������� ����������� ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=528981)
����������� ���������� ������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=988528)
����������� ������������ ��������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=972994)
������ ����������� � ���������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=278785)
����� ��������� ����������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=753056)
���� ����������� ������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=448608)
����� ������ ����������� ������������ (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=252739)
����������� ����� ����� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=461696)
������ ����������� � � ��������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=587425)
����������� ��� �������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=355986)
����������� � ������ �������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=691482)
���� ����������� ������ ��� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=57653)
����������� � ������������ �������� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=282445)
������� ����������� ����������� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=524884)
������ ����������� ������ (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=539670)
������� ������� ����������� ������ (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=322688)
������� ������ ����������� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=950943)
����������� ���������� ��� (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=487069)
����������� �� ������ � �������� (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=297234)
����������� � ������� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=568173)
����� ����������� �� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=148147)
������������ ����� ����� ����������� ������������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=101200)
���� ����� ����������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=566787)
����������� �� ��� 2000� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=695888)
����������� ������ �� 1500 ��� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=800535)
����������� � ��������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=300464)
�� ����� ��������, ������� ���������� ���������� ����� �������� �� �����
����� "����� �� ����� ����� ����������".
XVI �������� ���������� ��� �������, �� ������� ���� ���������� ��������
�������� �� �� ����� ��� ������� �����������. ����� ����, ������� ���
����������� ������������ �� ������ (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=320108)
��� ����� ����������� � ���������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=29921)
����������� ����� ���������� � ������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=250001)
����������� �� � ����������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/ctg.php?category=15&page=3)
����� ����� ������ ����� ����������� (http://bronagboodwie.comyr.com/article.php?article=654888)
�������� ��������� ���� ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=468460)
����� ����������� � �������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=585977)
������ ����������� ����� online (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=824957)
���� ���������� ������ ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/ctg.php?category=2&page=2)
����������� � ����� ����������� (http://exafarev.comyr.com/article.php?article=557287)
����������� ������������ ����� ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=40265)
����������� ����� � ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=782255)
����������� ������ ��������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=44505)
������� ����� ����������� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=845985)
����������� ������ ���� (http://fipiroza.comuf.com/article.php?article=717388)
���������� ������� ����������� � ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=785423)
����� ����������� � ���������� (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=419816)
������ ����������� � ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=495782)
����������� � 12 ������ ����� (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=987036)
�������� ������� �������� ����������� ������ (http://flananherga.comuf.com/article.php?article=528981)
����������� ���������� ������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=988528)
����������� ������������ ��������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=972994)
������ ����������� � ���������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=278785)
����� ��������� ����������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=753056)
���� ����������� ������� (http://funcribbakurt.comli.com/article.php?article=448608)
����� ������ ����������� ������������ (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=252739)
����������� ����� ����� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=461696)
������ ����������� � � ��������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=587425)
����������� ��� �������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=355986)
����������� � ������ �������� (http://golfsympmare.comyr.com/article.php?article=691482)
���� ����������� ������ ��� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=57653)
����������� � ������������ �������� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=282445)
������� ����������� ����������� (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=524884)
������ ����������� ������ (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=539670)
������� ������� ����������� ������ (http://hardfintumonk.comyr.com/article.php?article=322688)
������� ������ ����������� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=950943)
����������� ���������� ��� (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=487069)
����������� �� ������ � �������� (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=297234)
����������� � ������� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=568173)
����� ����������� �� ������ (http://mawoodrockgos.comyr.com/article.php?article=148147)
������������ ����� ����� ����������� ������������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=101200)
���� ����� ����������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=566787)
����������� �� ��� 2000� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=695888)
����������� ������ �� 1500 ��� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=800535)
����������� � ��������� (http://sietsawcalba.comyr.com/article.php?article=300464)
more...
raama123
02-24 10:29 AM
we are posting here to know the solution or how we can come out from the problem or possibility.
can you think about yourself when you are saying to others?
Thanks advancely.
Raama
can you think about yourself when you are saying to others?
Thanks advancely.
Raama
hot Jersey Shore Cast in Forence
kaisersose
05-28 12:43 PM
Greatly apprecite if anyone can give their inputs...
I have PD with dec 2006 and 140 approved. Filed 485 in July 2007. For october 2008 I will be done with 4 years of H1b. I am single and I may not get married untill later 2009 due to some family responsibalities. I am kind of concered about 485 getting approval by then which might jeoperdise my spouse visa later. Based on the present processing speed, mine might take minmum 2 years. But bit concerend what if USCICS make a mistake in processing 485 in terms of picking 485 from a later date and approving it?
Highly unlikely that they would approve a 485 when the PD is not current. The problem here is, even it has happened to someone, we will not see them come out and make an announcement as they fear their approval will be revoked. So we never hear of such cases.
So my query is...
1. If I now withdraw my 485 and later change company. SHould I again get a new labor and i140 approved with new company to file for 485.( Here I understand I can port my PD.).
Any inputs will be greatly apprecited....
Yes. You have to go through the process all over again, except you will be eligible for an earlier PD. The alternative is to seek employment with you original sponsor in which case, you can directly apply for 485 when your PD becomes current.
My advise is to stick to your 485 as 2006 is unlikely to become current by the time you get married. In the unlikely event of that happening, deal with the problem by trying to get your spouse in through other means.
I have PD with dec 2006 and 140 approved. Filed 485 in July 2007. For october 2008 I will be done with 4 years of H1b. I am single and I may not get married untill later 2009 due to some family responsibalities. I am kind of concered about 485 getting approval by then which might jeoperdise my spouse visa later. Based on the present processing speed, mine might take minmum 2 years. But bit concerend what if USCICS make a mistake in processing 485 in terms of picking 485 from a later date and approving it?
Highly unlikely that they would approve a 485 when the PD is not current. The problem here is, even it has happened to someone, we will not see them come out and make an announcement as they fear their approval will be revoked. So we never hear of such cases.
So my query is...
1. If I now withdraw my 485 and later change company. SHould I again get a new labor and i140 approved with new company to file for 485.( Here I understand I can port my PD.).
Any inputs will be greatly apprecited....
Yes. You have to go through the process all over again, except you will be eligible for an earlier PD. The alternative is to seek employment with you original sponsor in which case, you can directly apply for 485 when your PD becomes current.
My advise is to stick to your 485 as 2006 is unlikely to become current by the time you get married. In the unlikely event of that happening, deal with the problem by trying to get your spouse in through other means.
more...
house The #39;Jersey Shore#39; cast has
leo2606
10-29 04:43 PM
I did some mistakes when I went for Visa intervew in March 2007, I have done a new form on line and printed again.If they have not changed the usage of online DS-156 you could do the same thing.
Guys
I entered Passport Issuing city as Bangalore instead of Washington DC in DS-156 form, I am not able to update these fields as they are locked. I cant cancel this appointment as I have already done once before and if I cancel again I wont be able to book for another 3 months. What do I do? Please respond if you have any answers. Will calling the New Delhi customer support line help?
Thanks
Guys
I entered Passport Issuing city as Bangalore instead of Washington DC in DS-156 form, I am not able to update these fields as they are locked. I cant cancel this appointment as I have already done once before and if I cancel again I wont be able to book for another 3 months. What do I do? Please respond if you have any answers. Will calling the New Delhi customer support line help?
Thanks
tattoo #39;Jersey Shore#39; Cast Gets Pay
gomirage
07-30 02:05 AM
Why do you need to go to Canada ? If your you have I797 you are approved and can start working with adjustment of status. Am I missing something ?
more...
pictures The #39;Jersey Shore#39; Cast Load
bmeduru11
02-18 11:43 AM
Hi all,
I started working with a company in July 2006 and applied for I-140 in Nov 2006 with an existing labor of Nov 2004. My company is in losses all the time but I am getting more than proffered wage since I joined. Recently I received Intent to deny notice as there is no evidence that company can pay my in 2005. My attorney has replied for Intent to Deny notice and also applied for new I -140 using my own labor.
New I-140 got approved. I send a request for Interfiling to take out old I-140 from my 485 and use the approved I-140. when I checked the status of my case yesterday - both my old I-40 and 485 got denied. I didn't receive Denial notice yet.
Please suggest my any options I have for not losing I-485 and EAD.
I started working with a company in July 2006 and applied for I-140 in Nov 2006 with an existing labor of Nov 2004. My company is in losses all the time but I am getting more than proffered wage since I joined. Recently I received Intent to deny notice as there is no evidence that company can pay my in 2005. My attorney has replied for Intent to Deny notice and also applied for new I -140 using my own labor.
New I-140 got approved. I send a request for Interfiling to take out old I-140 from my 485 and use the approved I-140. when I checked the status of my case yesterday - both my old I-40 and 485 got denied. I didn't receive Denial notice yet.
Please suggest my any options I have for not losing I-485 and EAD.
dresses Jersey Shore Cast Land in
srini1976
01-23 01:37 AM
I used Clinton Bush Haiti Fund**|**Home (http://www.clintonbushhaitifund.org) to make my small contribution, it took less than 2 minutes, no account creation required, this site accepts paypal too.
https://re.clintonbushhaitifund.org/SSLPage.aspx?pid=3884
Thank you for providing the link. I also made my small contribution and also forwarded the link to my friends.
https://re.clintonbushhaitifund.org/SSLPage.aspx?pid=3884
Thank you for providing the link. I also made my small contribution and also forwarded the link to my friends.
more...
makeup as the quot;Jersey Shorequot; cast
krishna_brc
02-09 05:17 PM
Link - The link is not working..
Krishna/Sri, could you give me the correct link.
Thanks Krishna / Sri for very useful information. I will try this option before the other ones.
Thank you very much.
"www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/toolbox/contacts/deferred_inspection"
Thanks,
Krishna
Krishna/Sri, could you give me the correct link.
Thanks Krishna / Sri for very useful information. I will try this option before the other ones.
Thank you very much.
"www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/toolbox/contacts/deferred_inspection"
Thanks,
Krishna
girlfriend #39;Jersey Shore#39; cast resumes
ssbaruah@yahoo.com
05-01 09:41 AM
Thanks once again for your reply.
I want to make myself a little clear. Actually, the company thru which I applied my H1B transfer, withdrew my case recently when some query came. I did apply for premium processing paying more. Now the situation is I am still hunting job but as you know it is hard to get one these days. Nothing has been finalised as yet and I am having paystub till Jan. 2009. The company for which I worked won't like to give any letter for unpaid leave. Your case do give me some hope, but I am worried :
- no new company would like to process my case owing to my 3-4 months back paystub . Is it going to happen like this ? I am here with my family, and in that case I am confused whether I should stick to this place or leave.
Thanks again for your time and advise.
I want to make myself a little clear. Actually, the company thru which I applied my H1B transfer, withdrew my case recently when some query came. I did apply for premium processing paying more. Now the situation is I am still hunting job but as you know it is hard to get one these days. Nothing has been finalised as yet and I am having paystub till Jan. 2009. The company for which I worked won't like to give any letter for unpaid leave. Your case do give me some hope, but I am worried :
- no new company would like to process my case owing to my 3-4 months back paystub . Is it going to happen like this ? I am here with my family, and in that case I am confused whether I should stick to this place or leave.
Thanks again for your time and advise.
hairstyles Cera had a “pleasant day” hanging out with the cast of Jersey Shore.
abhijitp
07-19 12:57 PM
Thanks for clarifying milind70.
Abhijip - We all want to help here but please don't provide confusing info.
As for the original poster, he can still apply for AOS if he gets the receipt. I got mine from TSC on July 13 and they got the I140 on July 6. It wasn't labor subst though.
Hang in there another week. Can you verify if they cashed the check ?? They print the receipt# on the back.
Sorry... I did not know you could file concurrently before PERM came into play. So, does the original poster have to wait for the I-140 receipt? Only then can he apply for AOS using that receipt number? What if he applied for I-140 ONCE more, only this time concurrently along with a I-485? I think you can submit multiple I-140's ... just that you could only premium-process (BTW, no Premium Processing through this month anyways!) the one I-140 that goes out with the original "Labor certification approval".
Abhijip - We all want to help here but please don't provide confusing info.
As for the original poster, he can still apply for AOS if he gets the receipt. I got mine from TSC on July 13 and they got the I140 on July 6. It wasn't labor subst though.
Hang in there another week. Can you verify if they cashed the check ?? They print the receipt# on the back.
Sorry... I did not know you could file concurrently before PERM came into play. So, does the original poster have to wait for the I-140 receipt? Only then can he apply for AOS using that receipt number? What if he applied for I-140 ONCE more, only this time concurrently along with a I-485? I think you can submit multiple I-140's ... just that you could only premium-process (BTW, no Premium Processing through this month anyways!) the one I-140 that goes out with the original "Labor certification approval".
krishnam70
07-09 12:45 PM
I read about the problem in this thread and immediatly called all our friends and signed up for the drive. We went in a group of 25 people and signed up. Hopefully something will work out for Vinay and people like him. This is not a one time effort but once we are in the registry we have the capability to help many others who might be needing help. I urge members to please go to the drive's or request information on how to create drives in your own city and help in this good cause.
sp99
08-18 01:45 PM
Hello Folks,
I was also in the same dilemma 2 weeks back but now that i have DISH IPTV, i am very happy with the quality of the channels. I ordered Hindi Superpack, i was interested in Elite pack but it has $6 charge which becomes $40 for 4 channnels but add 4.99 and u get 8 channels...i was worried about buffering and quality of the programming but it is awesome..i watch it on my 50inch plasma..it is great..let me know if u have any more questions...
I was also in the same dilemma 2 weeks back but now that i have DISH IPTV, i am very happy with the quality of the channels. I ordered Hindi Superpack, i was interested in Elite pack but it has $6 charge which becomes $40 for 4 channnels but add 4.99 and u get 8 channels...i was worried about buffering and quality of the programming but it is awesome..i watch it on my 50inch plasma..it is great..let me know if u have any more questions...
No comments:
Post a Comment